SoloFlex, Inc. v. Direct Focus, Inc. dba Bowflex
You are here: Home »
The law firm Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, LLP (Seattle) retained our consultants, on behalf of the defendant, with regard to case no. 98-CV-00557 in the USDC for the District of Oregon, to provide an opinion of damages arising from the alleged infringement of trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. The property rights involved sales of Direct Focus' BowFlex line of exercise equipment based on direct advertising television commercials and spots.
Hampton IP Expert Services
We provided economic damage analyses, submitted a Rule 26 expert report, and gave deposition testimony.
Verdict
The case settled favorably for the defendant before trial.
Practice Area
Trademark Damage
Plaintif
SoloFlex
Defendant
Direct Focus dba Bowflex
Property
Direct advertising television infomercials
Industry
Fitness
Location
Seattle