<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">

  <channel>    
    <title>Hampton IP News and Events</title>
    <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/c/news/</link>
    <description>Receive news and event updates from Hampton IP &amp; Economic Consultants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <managingEditor></managingEditor>
    <copyright>Copyright 2012, Hampton IP &amp; Economic Consultants</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:04:44 -0500</lastBuildDate> 
    <generator>Pre-Built CMS Kits for ExpressionEngine (www.prebuiltcms.com)</generator>
       


    <item>
      <title>Ryan Worthen Joins Hampton IP &amp; Economic Consultants</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/ryan-worthen-joins-hampton-ip-economic-consultants/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>We are pleased to introduce Ryan Worthen who joined Hampton IP &amp;amp; Economic Consultants, LLC in 2011.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:04:44 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Evanston Insurance Company Retains Scott Hampton</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/evanston-insurance-company-retains-scott-hampton/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>Scott Hampton was retained by Evanston Insurance Co. as a damages expert for MGA Entertainment, Inc., et al. v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, et al., case number 08&#45;cv&#45;00457, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:58:27 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Rimini Street Retains Scott Hampton</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/rimini-street-retains-scott-hampton/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>Scott Hampton was retained by Rimini Street, Inc. as a damages expert for Oracle USA, Inc., et al. v. Rimini Street, Inc., et al., case number 2:10&#45;cv&#45;0106, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:42:27 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Hamilton Beach Retains Scott Hampton</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/hamilton-beach-retains-scott-hampton/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>Scott Hampton was retained by Hamilton Beach as a damages expert for Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Sunbeam Products, Inc., case number 3:11CV345, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:31:27 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sharp Corporation Retains Scott Hampton</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/sharp-corporation-retains-scott-hampton/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>Scott Hampton was retained by Sharp Corporation as a damages expert for Anvik Corporation v. Sharp Corporation, et al., case number 7:07&#45;cv&#45;00825, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:44:27 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Continues Sponsorship of Utah’s IP Summit</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/sponsorship-of-utah-ip-summit/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>In February 2011, Hampton IP sponsored and participated in the Utah Bar Association&amp;rsquo;s annual IP Summit.</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:23:57 -0400</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Medicis Pharmaceutical Retains Scott Hampton</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/medicis-pharmaceutical-retains-scott-hampton/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>Scott Hampton was retained by Medicis Pharmaceutical as a damages expert for Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Acella Pharmaceuticals, LLC, case number 2:10&#45;cv&#45;01780, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:56:27 -0400</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Federal Circuit Opines on 25% Rule of Thumb</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/federal-circuit-opines-on-25-rule-of-thumb/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>On January 4, 2011, the Federal Circuit found the  &amp;ldquo;25% Rule&amp;rdquo; to be  inadmissible as a basis for reasonable royalty damages  in its Uniloc  USA v. Microsoft opinion.</description>
      <category>Industry News</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:57:22 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Sharp Corporation Settles Patent Litigation</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/sharp-corporation-settles-patent-litigation/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>Scott  Hampton was retained by Sharp Corporation as a damages expert  for Advanced  Technology Incubator, Inc. v. Sharp Corporation, case  number 2:07&#45;CV&#45;468, in the United States District Court for the Eastern  District of Texas, Marshall  Division.</description>
      <category>Firm News</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:37:11 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Changes to Rule 26</title>
      <link>http://www.hamptonip.com/index.php/news/e/changes-to-rule-26/</link>
      <author></author>
      <description>According to a publication by the law firm Reed Smith,  before December 1, 2010, virtually all communications between an expert  witness and counsel were subject to discovery.</description>
      <category>Industry News</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:05:47 -0500</pubDate> 
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
